Close this search box.

Eurek Alert, 23rd February: Predicted impact of different alcohol taxation and pricing policies on health inequalities.

February 26th 2016

Thanks to SHAAP for their weekly media monitoring.
This article was taken from Eurek Alert, 23rd February

Predicted impact of different alcohol taxation and pricing policies on health inequalities.

Alcohol-content-based taxation or minimum unit pricing (MUP) are both predicted to reduce health inequalities more than taxation based on product value (ad valorem taxes) or alcohol tax increases under the current system (excise duty plus value added tax) in England, according to research published this week in PLOS Medicine. Petra Meier of the University of Sheffield, United Kingdom, and colleagues, used the Sheffield Alcohol Policy Model (SAPM), to estimate how price changes would affect individual-level alcohol consumption and how consumption changes affect the illnesses and deaths associated with 43 alcohol-attributable conditions.

Professor Meier and colleagues used the SAPM to simulate the impact of four different alcohol taxation and pricing policies: increasing tax under the current system, value-based taxation, alcohol-content-based taxation, and minimum unit pricing, each scaled to produce the same population-wide 4.3% decrease in alcohol-related mortality. They found that impacts of policy changes on moderate drinkers were small, regardless of socioeconomic group. However, among heavy drinkers, alcohol-content-based taxation and MUP were predicted to cause greater decreases in alcohol-attributable mortality among lower income groups (6.1% and 7.8% for alcohol-content-based taxation and MUP), compared to mortality decreases under the current policy or ad valorem taxes (of 3.2% and 2.9%, respectively). Among heavy drinkers in the highest socioeconomic group the effects on mortality rates were small (-1.3%, -1.4%, +0.2%, and +0.8% for increases in current duty rates, ad valorem tax, alcohol-content-based taxation and MUP, respectively).

Due to an absence of evidence, the researchers were not able to measure the impact of any tax avoidance, which could potentially vary between the policies. However, the authors conclude that “If achieving reductions in health inequalities is a priority, then the two policy options that target cheap, high-strength alcohol — minimum unit pricing and volumetric taxation — outperform ad valorem taxation and increasing the current UK tax.”

They also note the added value of specifically decreasing heavy drinking behaviour: “Importantly, unlike other tax options, these two policies target harmful drinking without at the same time targeting those in poorer population groups who do not engage in harmful drinking behaviour.”

Related News

Posted on 20th Jul 2020
The Society for the Study of Addiction sponsored a conference on conducting qualitative addiction research in March 2020, and the four Masterclass lectures and interviews are now freely available online. They provide a useful resource for qualitative researchers looking to develop their skills and careers.   The speakers are Prof Carol Emslie (Glasgow Caledonian University) on alcohol, Dr Caitlin Notley (UEA) on smoking,...
Posted on 26th Mar 2019
Just out – read the report of the ‘Enlightened New Alcohol Research Symposium‘ organised by SHAAP and the Scottish Alcohol Research Network as part of the 8th Alcohol Policy Conference in Edinburgh, November 2018.